Old John McCain

Posted in Silly, politics with tags , , , on October 22, 2008 by Rena Silverman

Ol’ John McCain…
Old John McCain
had a very fine brain
what a fine brain had he
he went to NAM
then he came back home
and he ran with the G.O.P.
he reached for the sky
and then faced the lie
that a little bit nutty was he was he
old John McCain is not insane
tweedle dum doo tweedle dee dee

Old John McCain
faced a harsh campaign
from Bush in a primary spree
the folks George hired
claimed that john had sired
and a little back baby had he
he lost in the poll
then tore Bush a hole
for a very big temper had he had he
old john McCain felt great disdain
tweedle dum doo tweedle dee dee
New John McCain
is running again
what a hungry old swain is he
now he backs the war
and says send more and he and George Bush agree
he chases the prize
and in G.O.P eyes
that’s all that they want to see to see

posted by Rena Silverman

Squeak AND Forever Hold Your Peace: the Hypocritical Proverbs of Man

Posted in Silly, blog, politics with tags , , , on October 7, 2008 by Rena Silverman

or, song of themselves…

A List of Proverbs in Couplets Contrasted

Look before you you leap.
He who hesitates is lost.

If at first u don’t succeed, try, try, and try again.
Don’t beat your head against a stone wall.

Absence makes the heart grow fonder.
Out of site out, of mind.

Two heads are better than one.
Paddle your own canoe.

Haste makes waste.
Time waits for no man.

You are never too old to learn.
You can’t teach an old dog new tricks.

One word is sufficient to the wise.
Talk is cheap.

Better safe than sorry.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Nice guys finish last.

Don’t judge a book by its cover.
Clothes make the man.

The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
Silence is golden.

Birds of a feather flock together.
Opposites attract.

The pen is mightier than the sword.
Actions speak louder than words.

All of these are actual proverbs from the same, rather confusing book. You can do the research.

by Rena Silverman

Obama Wee Sing

Posted in Silly, politics with tags , on August 30, 2008 by Rena Silverman

We don’t know much about him
we don’t know what he’s done
we don’t know what he stands for
or why he wants to run
we don’t know if hes capable
or even if hes sane
but…like…lets vote Obama!
he’s handsome on his plane!

but..what if he’s dishonest?
or maybe really dense?
he might name katie couric
secretary of defense
or maybe hell go crazy
with several wars unfurled
but woohoo! lets vote obama!
its only just the world

he might fall down like jerry ford
or bore us like al gore
or in japan like old g bush
puke sushi on the floor
he might trade arms for hostages
then later not recall
or rant like richard nixon
to the paintings on the wall

he might be weak like carter
or mean like L.B.J.
he might have secrets in his pants
who knows he might be … ?
he could undermine our allies..
and threaten global peace
or cause another civil war
or worse become obese…

he could shred the constitution
and leave our troops unpaid
sell nukes to north korea
(maybe shag his aid?)
he could…burst our nation’s budget
leave everything amiss
but hey lets vote obama
he can’t be worse than this!

posted by rena silverman

The Under-Cover-Letter Man, by Rena Silverman

Posted in Silly, blog with tags , , , , , , , on July 24, 2008 by Rena Silverman

Or, How Many Application Letters Does a Man Have to Write, Before He Can Stop Being a Man?

Few things are more demoralizing than writing job application letters.

“There you are trying at once to write something that shows that you fit in,” says John Doyle., “while at the same time you’re trying to show you’re different.”

Doyle knows this agony well. After the dot-com bubble, he lost his job as a computer programmer and he began sending out ten to fifteen letters per day. “There is nothing worse than trying to sell yourself to a stranger,” he says. “For me, it went on for month after month.”

After diligently sending out the letters and receiving no responses, Doyle finally decided to see whether his results would be different if he wrote a letter that was nakedly honest. So Doyle sat down and wrote the brazen truth about his strengths and weaknesses.

“I know how to program in Java Scripts,” he said in one letter, referring to a computer program that was required for the job. “By that I mean I’ve used the program several times before, but like everyone else I will go look in a book when I’m asked to use it.” He also wrote that he had been trained at a specific university, but then he added, “Truth is, I took a class once at that university and then I dropped out. But I’m pretty sure you won’t check.” He referred to himself as a “team leader,” which he qualified by saying, “In other words, my boss likes me enough that if you call him he will say I am a ‘team leader.’ “

No one responded to Doyle’s letter. “That’s no worse than what was the case in the past,” he points out.

Soon, Doyle began writing all of his letters with self-defeated frankness. And as his cell phone remained a buzzless box, he grew more surprised by the lack of reaction. “I was applying to all these places that said they valued creativity,” he says. “But then when creativity hit them in the face, they didn’t even know it.” He did not expect to get hired, but he did expect that at least one person in the several hundred human-resources offices he contacted would drop him a note simply saying thanks for the clever humor. It never happened.

In frustration, Doyle shifted his approach, moving from candor to absurdity.

Previously he had been sending his real resume. He replaced it with a sheet of paper with “RESUME” underlined at the top and the words “Hire Me,” and nothing else, in seventy-two-point lettering in the center of the page.

His cover letters featured a wry sense of humor. In one letter he explained that his prior job with Ford Motors involved leading the programming team in charge of assembly-line robotics. “My experience there taught me about the maximum speed and force with which you could have the robot insert a new part, without damaging the chassis of the vehicle,” he wrote. “I feel that this experience will translate almost seamlessly to Transplantation Services at your hospital, and I
think you will agree.”

If anyone was laughing, they weren’t telling John Doyle.
But one day he finally struck a chord, in a letter for a job opening at a bookstore. Having opened with the standard formalities about his sales experience and ability to work flexible hours, he wrote, “Should you require further information, or additional references, please do not hesitate to call. Also, do not hesitate to call if you are curious as to who would win in a fight between Ernest Hemingway and Morley Callaghan.”

It continued: “Callaghan did win, during a friendly match where F. Scott Fitzgerald kept time. He did not keep it very well, and the winning blow was struck after the time had gone over, leading Hemingway to accuse F. Scott of rigging the match. A ridiculous literary feud followed, along with some pretty good books by all involved.”

Doyle says he is still not sure why the bookstore hired him.

“I don’t know,” he said, “I guess they were looking for someone that customers would enjoy talking to but who also knew something about books.”

posted by rena silverman

If the #2 pencil is so cool, why is it still #2? by Rena Silverman

Posted in Silly with tags , , , , on June 28, 2008 by Rena Silverman

Anyway, sharpen your mediocre pencils and listen up. This is a math test. If you fail you can go play the lottery (it’s just a tax on people who are bad at math).

Please sharpen your number two pencils.

1) After 11 years years of service, a math teacher receives an $80 gift certificate to Shaw’s Gas in lieu of a raise. How much of that money will be left after taxes? Express in bottles of rum.

2) A name-brand bottle of rum costs $12.95. The generic brand sells for $7.50. If a math teacher buys 4 bottles of generic rum each week, how much does he save each month? How much does he save each year? How much money does the teacher save over the course of 11 years?

3) A math teacher’s new apartment is approximately 12 ft. long and 5 ft. wide, and the bathroom takes up 50% of the apartment. A normal human-sized bed is 6 ft x 3 ft. Does the math teacher have enough room for a standard bed? Or will he have to sleep in some kind of cat bed?

4) By order of the high courts, a math teacher must keep 1,000 ft. away from his ex-wife at all times. Say, theoretically, she lives on 91st and York, exactly halfway between the math teacher’s apartment and his school. How far out of his way does the teacher have to walk every morning just to keep from getting arrested?

5) A math teacher is frightened 95% of the time. How many hours a day is he frightened? What she so afraid of?

posted by rena silverman

An Urgent and Confidential Note from Nigeria on Misinterpreting Foreign Business Gestures…

Posted in politics with tags , , , , on June 25, 2008 by Rena Silverman

…or, Lots of animals here…would you like to ride on your own ass??

They are as desperate as they are formulaic. And with the spread of the Internet, the so-called “Nigerian letters” have grown from being an occasional curiosity to a relentless plague on our in-boxes.

Under a subject line that reads “Urgent and Confidential,” these scams usually open with, “I am in search of a reputable person to assist me with an urgent business matter.” And they go on to explain that some important government official has died and that there is a need to remove a large amount of money from the country before other officials seize it.
“Any help you provide in the effort,” the e-mail usually says, “will be repaid with a large percentage of the money.” And while the ubiquity of these scam emails should undermine their effectiveness, somehow they persist.

In 1996, Steven Cooper was receiving an average of four or five of the letters by fax and e-mail per day. “What got to me about them was the sheer quantity,” says Cooper, a fifty-one-year-old chemist based in Albuquerque, New Mexico. “They’re also amazingly foolish and blatant scams.

So one day Cooper decided to reply.

Using an alias, he wrote that he wanted to learn more about the business offer. And with that, he began a ten-year habit of scamming the scammers as he wove elaborate webs—often cast with characters drawn from history or famous works of fiction-looping the scammers into drawn-out correspondences that sometimes lasted up to a year.

“These scams are ridiculous,” he says. “But they’ve definitely provided me with quite a bit of fun.”

For every half-baked explanation a scammer sent about the origin of the money, Cooper included an implausible feature to his own story.

With each fake tax form or faux lawyer’s bill that the scammer sent to justify the need for small amounts of money, Cooper replied with a fake newspaper profile or an official-looking travel itinerary to bolster his own responses.

Before long, Steven Cooper found himself juggling multiple stories at once, spending close to twenty-five hours a week keeping the scammers looped in. “I’m much more efficient now since I have a lot of the documents on file,” he says. “Still, creating new stories takes a fair amount of work.”

But none compare to his masterpiece about Don Quixote. “I think that was definitely my best work,” Cooper says.

After being contacted by an African scammer calling himself Derin Owolabi, Cooper responded as Don Quixote. “I do not know if I can help you but I do take pride in supporting worthy quests,” Mr. Quixote wrote. “I am a country gentleman, no longer young.”
Always sprinkled with direct passages from Cervantes’s classic work, the communications quickly culminated in Owolabi’s request that Mr. Quixote come to visit him in Benin to finalize the deal.

Mr. Quixote agreed to the request. But first he explained that he would need to travel with two others. “My party would include my faithful servant, Sancho Panza, and my Lady Dulcinea,” he wrote.

All are welcome, Owolabi responded.

Next, Mr. Quixote wrote that there was a problem with the flight: Air France said that he could not bring his horse on board.

“If Air France does not want to carry your horse, don’t worry,” Owolabi replied. “I am going to make arrangements to hire one for you in Cotonou. “

Many letters and much planning later, the two men finally spoke on the phone. Owolabi mentioned that Mr. Quixote sounded young for his age. Never passing up an opportunity to press the limits of credulity, Mr. Quixote replied that, in fact, he looked even younger than he sounded because he had received plastic surgery. “I owe all my looks to Dr. Polly Urethane, a plastic surgeon at St. John’s Hospital in Santa Fe,” he said.

Finally, after sending Owolabi their official travel itinerary, Mr. Quixote and his entourage set out on their journey.

Unfortunately, Mr. Quixote ran into problems after he lost his temper in Paris.
“French See Red over Attack on Moulin Rouge” was the headline that ran in the SOCIÉTÉ DE L’OISEAU EN CAGE, which Mr. Quixote’s lawyer sent to Owolabi to explain what happened. The article said that three American tourists had stolen horses from Parisian police officers and charged the famous theater, ominously waving baguettes. After being arrested, the three were later released. Eventually, the lawyer said, Mr. Quixote and his group got back on their way. They flew to Cairo, where they were to proceed overland to Benin.

That’s when the real tragedy struck.

“It is with a heavy heart that I must convey to you the melancholy news that Mr. Don Quixote has been found dead in the north Sahara,” read the next e-mail that came from Mr. Quixote’s lawyer. Attached was a newspaper article-which like all of Cooper’s handiwork was impressively realistic-that explained that Mr. Quixote had been attacked by a pack of about forty men led by a man named Ali Baba. Cooper says that although he has been spinning ridiculous yarns for years in correspondences with scammers, few people ever seem to catch on.

“Considering that they are scam artists themselves, it’s incredible how thick some of these people are,” says Cooper, who has posted his many epistolary exchanges with the scammers on his Web site, www.redhotchilidogs.com. “The only time I’ve been snagged by a reference was a lady who realized that the picture I sent of myself was actually of our governor Bill Richardson.”

Cooper says that he has received half a dozen emails over the years from people who actually lost money in these scams. One person said that her semi senile father had mailed more than $45,000 in response to a solicitation.

“For me,” he says, “it just seemed logical to turn the table on these people.”

posted by Rena Silverman

Add to Technorati Favorites

The Ten Commandments of Partisan Warfare

Posted in politics with tags , , , on June 14, 2008 by Rena Silverman

1. Keep it simple
A long-winded, nuanced, complex argument is a guaranteed ticket to disaster. Just ask John Kerry or Al Gore or Michael Dukakis. To be effective, you need to be able to fit your basic message on a
bumper sticker.

2. Personalize the issue
Don’t talk about issues in an abstract way. Persuade by talking in terms of how issues affect people, relate your own experiences, and highlight your opponent’s self-interest (e.g., show them how Republican policies mean more money in their pocket, more personal freedom, and more jokes from the likes of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, at the expense of Republicans).

3. Frame the Argument to your advantage
Make your case by presenting each issue according to your own beliefs and values, not theirs. Never, for example, let a sanctimonious liberal elitist lecture you about values or the meaning of tolerance. If you let them frame the debate, they win.

4. Find common ground
Build your street cred with liberals by badmouthing a despised conservative—say, Ann Coulter or Pat Robertson. That way you’ll defy stereotypes and demonstrate that your allegiances are not blind. Continue to rope them in by appealing to shared values and common interests before unleashing your Trojan horse–style sneak attack.

5. Expose Hypocrisy
Nothing undermines an argument faster than exposing hypocritical behavior, contradictory statements, and wholesale fakery—either on the part of your opponents or the politicians they’re defending. There are few sights as satisfying as watching exposed hypocrites grasp at fig leaves to cover their shame.

6. Exude Confidence
Always project the courage of your convictions. Like bees and dogs, your opponent can smell fear and weakness. How you say something is just as important as what you say.

7. Don’t Sermonize
No one likes to be lectured to, and no one likes a self-righteous windbag. Ranting from atop your soapbox will only harden your opponent’s position and make him or her more hostile. If you’ve made an enemy, you haven’t won an argument.

8. Make Your Opponent Laugh
Humor can be a potent weapon in political debate. Making humorous observations—and demonstrating an ability to laugh at yourself—will help disarm your opponents and keep them engaged. If funny isn’t your thing, quote professional quipsters like Dennis Miller or unintentional comedians like Howard Dean.

9. Be Open-Minded
It’s the civility, stupid. Be prepared to listen respectfully and concede a point or two before moving in for the kill. You can learn a lot from people with whom you disagree—even those you believe to be outrageously misguided—and fine-tune your arguments in the process.

10. Pick Battles You Can Win
Don’t expend too much energy trying to win over a staunch conservative. You’d have better luck trying to coax a rock to grow. Target the fence-sitters and the more easily converted. It’s a strategy that has worked for religious missionaries for centuries, and it can work for you.

www.rena-silverman.com

I now pronounce you Running Mates… by Rena silverman

Posted in politics with tags , , , , , on June 7, 2008 by Rena Silverman

Choosing a Vice President

it’s no cooincidence that a vice presidentialial candidate is often called a running “mate,” because as a presidential candidate, choosing your running mate shares traits with matrimonial practices from a number of different cultures.

As with Hindus or the Hapsburg Dynasty, a presidential-vice presidential match-up is much like an arranged marriage, a convenient couplin brought together by outside forces such as party power brokers, the media, and pressure frompublic opinion.

As in the Catholic tradition, the Presidential Candidate and his/her running mate are bonded together for life; two fates, inextricably and permanently intertwined.

And, just like marriage, the two candidates will likely enjoy an initial honeymoon period of approximately 3 to 4 days, followed by inevitable ups and downs, after which will come an ensemble settlement into a long period  of static coexistence.

There are, of course, obvious differences between finding a mate and finding a running mate. For one,you have to date within your league. Also, as a Presidential Candidate shopping for a Veep, it is important to distinguish between regular, harmless, irritating flaws and”the fatal flaw, a concept that has littered history with failed campaigns that were dragged into the electoral abyss by a vice-presidential candidates.

Consider George McGovern, who chose Terry Eagleton to be partner on the Democratic ticket only to find out that Eagleton had undergone electroshock treatments in order to lose. Once the public found out that Eagleton was a closet nut, he was forced to withdraw, forcing the McGovern to send Richard Nixon a return ticket to the White House.

Or consider Democratic nominee Al Gore, who chose Sen. Joe Lieberman as his running mate, not realizing that lieberman was actually a Republican.

Choose the right running mate, and trust me, you’ll earn yourself twenty-five whole electoral votes.

In the meantime, I suggest Mr. Obama play this game from CQ Politics to determine his Vice Presidential Candidate.

posted by Rena Silverman

THE DIRT OF YOUR ENEMY IS YOUR VICTORY SOAP, by rena silverman

Posted in politics with tags , on June 5, 2008 by Rena Silverman

We need to find McCain’s Achilles’ heel and leak it to the press in order to cause lasting and permanent damage to his candidacy.

Everyone has something to hide . Everyone was dumb and stupid at one point in their life — it’s a frontal-lobe phenomenon that strikes the young. the deeper you dig, the more dirt you uncover.

Here’s a list of possible things to look for as we try to wreck his candidacy:

Petty theft

Sexual deviancy

Tax evasion

Littering

Failure to send thank-you notes for wedding gifts Drinking and driving Not recycling Poor tipping Software piracy Actual high seas piracy Undercooking poultry Alcohol addiction Employing undocumented workers Benefiting from a sweetheart land deal Drug addiction Lateness Attempting to initiate “the wave” at sporting events And most of all, the specifics of Anger Management.

Now, for the digging process:

So, in order to exercise successful humiliation, we must each ask ourselves this: “What would I be mortally embarrassed about if people found out about it?”

Now, Google: John McCain + your embarrassing issue .

When you find your result, determine the level of embarrassment.

If it’s embarrassing enough leak like its hemophilia — it all over this blog, talking points memo, the politico, and the political wire. Just go NUTS. Call MSNBC. Call CNN. Call the DNC. Anything.

Excuse me while I shudder.

The Poser

Posted in politics with tags , , , , , , , on June 4, 2008 by Rena Silverman

Obama Practices Looking-Off-Into-Future Pose

May 28, 2008 | Issue 44•22

ObamaSubtle muscular adjustments can show, from left, wistfulness, determination, and unbridled hopefulness.

posted by Rena Silverman